lørdag 20. desember 2008

National Board of Canada

National Board of Canada

Mengder av animasjoner og filmer. Meget bra.
Mange kunstneriske kortfilmer.



onsdag 17. desember 2008

Om pedagogikk i det 21 århundre

Even if you have a 21st Century classroom (flexible and adaptable); even if you are a 21st century teacher ; (an adaptor, a communicator, a leader and a learner, a visionary and a model, a collaborator and risk taker) even if your curriculum reflects the new paradigm and  you have the facilities and resources that could enable 21st century learning - you will only be a 21st century teacher if how you teach changes as well. Your pedagogy must also change.



So what is 21st Century pedagogy?

Definition:
pedagogy - noun the profession, science, or theory of teaching. 
Source: http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/pedagogy?view=uk

How we teach must reflect how our students learn. It must also reflect the world our students will move into. This is a world which is rapidly changing, connected, adapting and evolving. Our style and approach to teaching must emphasise the learning in the 21st century.

The key features of 21st Century Pedagogy are:
?    building technological, information and media fluencies [Ian Jukes]
?    Developing thinking skills
?    making use of project based learning
?    using problem solving as a teaching tool
?    using 21st C assessments with timely, appropriate and detailed feedback and reflection
?    It is collaborative in nature and uses enabling and empowering technologies
?    It fosters Contextual learning bridging the disciplines and curriculum areas

Knowledge
Knowledge does not specifically appear in the above diagram. Does this mean that we do not teach content or knowledge? Of course not. While a goal we often hear is for our students to create knowledge, we must scaffold and support this constructivist process. The process was aptly describe in a recent presentation by Cisco on Education 3.0 [Michael Stevenson VP Global Education Cisco 2007]

We need to teach knowledge or content in context with the tasks and activities the students are undertaking. Our students respond well to real world problems. Our delivery of knowledge should scaffold the learning process and provide a foundation for activities. As we know from the learning pyramid content delivered without context or other activity has a low retention rate.

Image2



Image 3

Thinking skills
Thinking Skills  are a key area. While much of the knowledge we teach may be obsolete within a few years, thinking skills acquired will remain with our students for their entire lives. Industrial age education has had a focus on Lower Order Thinking Skills. In Bloom's taxonomy the lower order thinking skills are the remembering and understanding aspects. 21st Century pedagogy focuses on the moving  students  from Lower Order Thinking Skills to Higher Order Thinking Skills.


Image 4

The 21st Century Teacher scaffolds the learning of students, building on a basis of knowledge recall and comprehension to use and apply skills; to analyse and evaluate  process, outcomes and concequences, and to make, create and innovate. For each discipline in our secondary schools  the process is subtly  different. 

Collaboration
The 21st century is an age of collaboration as well as the Information Age.  21st Century students, our digital natives, are collaborative. The growth  of social networking tools, like bebo and myspace and the like, is fueled by Digital natives and Gen Y. The world, our students are graduating into is a collaborative one. 

Collaborative projects such as Julie Lindsay's and Vicki Davis's Flatclassroom project and the Horizon Project, iearns and many others are brilliant examples of collaboration in the classrooms and beyond.  These projects, based around tools like ning or wikis, provide students and staff a medium to build and share knowledge and develop understanding. 

For example:

My own students are collaborating with students from three other schools, one in Brisbane, another in Qatar and a third in Vienna; on developing resources for a common assessment item. Collaboratively, they are constructing base knowledge on the technologies pertent to the topic. They are examining, evaluating and analysing the social and ethical impacts of the topic. But perhaps even more holistically they are being exposed to different interpretations, cultures and perspectives - Developing an international awareness which will be a key attribute in our global future.

URL: http://casestudy-itgs.wikispaces.com


Don Tapscott in Wikinomics, gives are many of examples of the business world adopting and succeeding by using global collaboration. 

In a recent blog post from the Official google Blog, Google identified these as key traits or abilities in 1st Century Employees...

"... communication skills. Marshalling and understanding the available evidence isn't useful unless you can effectively communicate your conclusions." 
"... team players. Virtually every project at Google is run by a small team. People need to work well together and perform up to the team's expectations. "

Source: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/our-googley-advice-to-students-major-in.html

So to prepare our students, our teaching should also model collaboration. A vast array of collaborative tools are available to - wikis, classroom blogs, collaborative document tools,social networks, learning management systems -  Many are available at no cost. If you have not yet tried them, look at:
?    wikis - wet paint and wiki spaces
?    Classroom blogs - edublogs, classroomblogmeister
?    Collaborative document tools - Google documents, zoho documents
?    Social Networks - ning
?    learning managements systems - Moodle etc
These tools are enablers of collaboration, and therefore enablers of 21st century teaching and learning.

Collaboration is not a 21st century skill it is a 21st century essential. 

If we look at UNESCO's publication "The four pillars of Education, Learning: The Treasure within" Collaboration is a key element of each of the four pillars.

  • Learning to know
  • Learning to do
  • Learning to live together
  • Learning to be

(http://www.unesco.org/delors/fourpil.htm)

Collaboration is not limited to the confines of the classroom. Students and teachers  collaborate across the planet, and beyond the time constraints of the teaching day. Students work with other students regionally, nationally and globally. Learners seek and work with experts as required. This is 21st Century Collaboration

Real World, Inter-disciplinary & project based learning
21st Century students do not want abstract examples rather they focus on real world problems. They want what they learn in one subject to be relevant and applicable in another curriculum area. As teachers we need to extend our areas of expertise, collaborate with our teaching peers in other subjects and the learning in one discipline to learning in another.
Projects should bring together and reinforce learning across disciplines. The sum of the students learning will be greater than the individual aspects taught in isolation. This is a holistic overview of the education process which builds on and values every aspect of the 21st  Century students education.


Image 5

Assessment 
Assessment is still a key part of 21st Century Pedagogy. This generation of students responds well to clear goals and objectives, assessed in a transparent manner. 

Students should be involved in all aspects of the assessment process. Students who are involved in setting and developing assessment criteria, marking and moderation will have a clearer understanding of:
?    what they are meant to do, 
?    how they are meant to do it, 
?    why it is significant 
?    why it is important. 
Such students will undoubtedly do better and use the assessment process as a part of their learning. 

Students are often painfully honest about their own performance and that of their peers. They will, in a collaborative project, fairly assess those who contribute and those who don't. 

This is their education, their learning and their future - they must be involved in it.

Linked to assessment  is the importance of timely, appropriate, detailed and specific feedback. Feedback as a learning tool, is second only to the teaching of thinking skills [Michael Pohl]. As 21st Century teachers, we must provide and facilitate safe and appropriate feedback, developing an environment where students can safely and supportively be provided with and provide feedback. Students are often full of insight and may have as valid a perspective as we teachers do.

Fluency
What is fluency and why is it better than Literacy? Ian Jukes introduced this concept at NECC. He asserts that students need to move beyond literacy to fluency. They need to be
fluent in:
?    The use of technology = technological fluency, 
?    Collecting, processing, manipulating and validating information = information fluency,
?    using, selecting, viewing and manipulating media = media fluency,

What is fluency compared to literacy? A person who is fluent in a language does not need to think about speech, or reading rather it is an unconscious process of understanding. A person who is literate in the language must translate the speech or text. This applies to our students and their use of 21st century media. We need them to be unconsciously competent in the use and manipulation of media, technology and information.

The conscious competence model illustrates the difference between Literacy and Fluency. The person or student who is literate is in the conscious competence category. The person or student who is fluent is in the unconscious competence category.

Image 6

As educators, we must identify, develop and reinforce these skill sets until students become literate and then fluent..

Conclusion and the path forward.

To teach using 21st Century pedagogy, educators must be student centric. Our curricula and assessments  must inclusive, interdisciplinary and contextual; based on real world examples. 

Students must be key participants in the assessment process, intimate in it from  start to finish, from establishing purpose and criteria, to assessing and moderating. 
Educators must establish a safe environment for students to collaborate in but also to discuss, reflect and provide and receive feedback in.

We should make use of collaborative and project based learning, using enabling tools and technologies to facilitate this. 

We must develop, in students, key fluencies and make use of higher order thinking skills. Our tasks, curricula, assessments and learning activities must be designed to build on the Lower Order Thinking Skills and to develop Higher Order Thinking Skills.

Image 7

 

Acknowledgements:
For being a brilliant critical friend, thanks for the advise and especially for the grammar - Marg McLeod.

By Andrew Churches

About Us

Beyond the basics, students will need 21st century competencies to survive and thrive in the future. They will have to know how to think critically, apply knowledge to new situations, analyze information, understand new ideas, communicate effectively, collaborate, solve problems, and make decisions. School districts are looking for ways to help students acquire these new skills while they also address NCLB mandates.

This 21st Century Connections site links students, teachers and administrators to the latest resources, creative tools and educational leaders behind digital learning. Provided by Lenovo, Adobe, Intel and Futurekids, the site is hosted by Technology & Learning, NewBay Media.

Visit our other sites:

Fire ting å huske for Skoleledere og ICT

http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?i=56397


A new generation of students with vastly
different learning needs is redefining expectations for classroom
instruction, and a growing emphasis on school accountability is
changing the role of the school district IT leader: These were two of
the main ideas outlined in a Dec. 10 webcast from the Consortium of
School Networking titled "Major Technology Trends that School District
CTOs Must Know."


According to William Rust, research director for the IT research and
consulting firm Gartner, there is a new digital divide occurring in
schools. Whereas this divide used to refer to whether or not students
had access to technology, now it concerns whether schools are using
technology effectively to achieve results.


Rust identified four key trends that school district chief
technology officers (CTOs) should be aware of: accountability, the
changing nature of learners, the accessibility of technology, and the
"internal and external demands" that are now placed on ed-tech
executives.


"If CTOs are thinking about these four factors and how they can keep
up with these changes, they'll stay ahead of the divide," he said.


Regarding the changing nature of learners, Gartner believes that
so-called "digital natives" will demand, and need, new types of
learning experiences.


Citing a report by Ian Jukes and Anita Dose of the InfoSavvy Group,
Rust said digital native learners prefer (1) receiving information
quickly and from multiple resources; (2) parallel processing and
multitasking; (3) processing pictures, sounds, and video before text;
(4) random access to hyperlinked multimedia information; and (5)
interacting and networking simultaneously with many others.


"The biggest shift we're seeing right now is student preference
shifting from print to digital resources," Rust noted. "It's all about
the web."


As for accountability, Rust explained that No Child Left Behind's
extensive data tracking and reporting requirements have prompted the
use of robust student information systems and data-warehousing
strategies in schools. Now, the next logical step will be to apply this
same degree of scrutiny to schools' financial data, Gartner believes.


onsdag 24. september 2008

Om Finnland, skole og mer

Artikkel kopiert fra Nettutgave, Dagbladet, 23.sept 2008
Lenke til originalartikkelen
«I GÅR BLE FINLANDskolemassakrenes land. Jokela 2007. Kauhajoki 2008.» Slik innleder sjefredaktør Margareta Björklund i den finske avisa Vasabladet sin kommentar på forsiden av avisa i dag. Hun stiller spørsmål mange nå spør seg: Hvordan kunne dette skje? Og hvordan kunne det skje igjen, i vanligvis så fredelige Finland? Björklund skriver at det ikke finnes noen enkle svar på spørsmålet. Men at det er flere delsvar. - Vi vet at det er mange unge i vårt land som har det vanskelig psykisk. Vi vet at ungdomspsykiatrien har for lite penger og skolene for få psykologer. (..) Vi vet at voksne er dårlige til å sette grenser. Vi vet at internett ikke bare har ført godt med seg (..) Og vi vet at Finland er et våpentett land, skriver hun. FINLAND ER BLITT HOLDTfram som et av landene i Europa med det beste skolesystemet, og landet ligger på topplass på Pisa-undersøkelsene, noe som har fått mange norske lærere og politikere til å se på det finske skolen som et eksempel til etterfølgelse. Men som Björklund skriver: En undersøkelse utført av Unicef viser at mange finske barn har åpenbare vanskeligheter med sine familie- og vennskapsforhold. Krisepsykolog Atle Dyregrov har undervist om traumer i Finland i nesten tjue år. Dyregrov har over en lengre har periode påpekt samspillet mellom elevenes tendenser til vold og et skolemiljø som ikke klarer å møte deres utviklingsbehov. - FINNENE HAR EN SVÆRT TAUS KULTUR med begrensede uttrykksmuligheter, sier Dyregrov til Dagbladet.no. - De sliter med krigstraumer, med høy selvmordsrate og med stort alkoholforbruk. De har en kultur der det å uttrykke sine følelser ikke er vanlig. For noen år siden ble tre hundre finner sendt til Danmark for å lære smalltalk, forteller psykologen. - Heller ikke Norge er best i verden når det gjelder å uttrykke seg, men i den norske skolen lærer i alle fall barna ekspressive ferdigheter. I Finland har de et svært gammeldags skolesystem som ikke trener barna i uttrykke følelser i samme grad. DETTE ER TYPISK FOR den finske folkesjela. Har du et problem, så formidler du det ikke til andre, sier krisepsykologen. - Jeg vil ikke si at det finske skolesystemet skaper skytedramaer, men det er en av tingene som forsterker muligheten for det. Vi tenker at i det øyeblikket du er i stand til å formidle det du sliter med til andre, så åpner du porten til hjelpeapparatet. I likhet med Björklund understreker Dyregrov at det ikke finnes noen enkle forklaringer, men at det er nødvendig å se på både skolesystemet, familie og individuelle faktorer. - Hvorfor tror du de finske drapsmennene har slått til mot skoler og ikke mot andre institusjoner? - Av samme årsak som i USA. Skolesystemet legger ikke til rette for de som faller utenfor, og følelser stenges ute i stedet for å bli bearbeidet. Mange erfarer at de ikke blir verdsatt av klassekamerater og lærere, og dersom de tar opp et problem, behandles det insensitivt. Dette skjer fra man er seks-sju år til man når voksen alder. Samtidig er dette en lang periode av livet der man tilbringer mesteparten av all våken tid på skolen. - Skaper dette en potensielt farlig avmaktsfølelse? - Ja, men det er viktigere å huske på at dette fratar mange følelsen av å ha en verdi. Verdi bekreftes gjennom samspill mellom sosiale omgivelser. Dersom du føler at du skyves unna, ikke hører til eller kanskje mobbes, så har du noen av byggesteinene som er på plass for å forklare det som skjer ved skolemassakre. IFØLGE FINSK POLITI la Saari igjen flere brev der han skriver at han planla ugjerningen i flere år. - Jeg hater menneskeheten og den menneskelige rasen, og løsningen er Walther.22, skriver han i en av beskjedene. - I går sa mange eksperter at folk som skyter sine medelever på den måten som vi har sett i Kauhajoki, er ute av stand til å føle noe som helst når de skader andre, sier Atle Dyregrov. - Men vi må ikke glemme at empati er noe vi lærer. Hvis vi ikke blir stimulert, så blir ikke denne delen av hjernen utviklet. Det er samspillet mellom barn og deres nære omgivelser som utvider barnas kapasitet til å føle empati med hverandre, konstaterer han. UNGE I FINLAND ER blant verdens mest selvdestruktive, viser en rapportskrevet av forskeren Tuula Uusitalo for det finske barneombudet. Ifølge tall fra Verdens helseorganisasjon er selvmordsraten blant unge finske menn femte høyest i verden, og blant unge kvinner er Finland nummer to på lista. Antallet selvmord blant unge øker, til tross for at den totale selvmordsraten stadig synker. 103 av 997 som tok sitt eget liv i Finland i 2005 var under 24 år. Uusitalos rapport viser at 10-15 prosent av unge finner tenker ofte og seriøst på å ta sitt eget liv, og 3-5 prosent har forsøkt å forlate livet ved egen hjelp. Den klart hyppigste faktoren til selvmord blant unge finner er depresjon og sosiale problemer som følge av dette, viser rapporten. Omkring 75 prosent av de som tar sitt eget liv i Finland har symptomer på depresjon, og mange har vært kronisk depressive. FINNENES BERYKTEDE FORKJÆRLIGHET FOR FLASKA er også en negativ faktor i det finske samfunnet. Siden 2004 har prisen på alkohol sunket kraftig i Finland, som et mottiltak mot den billige importen av øl og sprit fra Estland. Dette resulterte i et økt forbruk. Ifølge Det finske statistikkbyrået, ble alkohol i 2006 den ledende dødsårsaken for både menn og kvinner i arbeidsdyktig alder (mellom 16 og 64 år). - Blant unge finner har vi imidlertid sett en annen utvikling. Unge i dag velger bort alkohol. Færre drikker alkohol totalt sett, og færre drikker alkohol hyppig, sier Salme Ahlström ved forskningsinstituttet Stakes i Helsinki. Alström har undersøkt det finske materialet i den europeiske ESPAD-undersøkelsen, som tar for seg skolelevers rusforbuk. Resultatene slår hull på stereotypien om finske ungdommers alkoholforbruk. - Fram til 2007 var det enkelte regionale skiller mellom by og land, men disse er nå jevnet ut. Når det gjelder foreldrenes utdanning, har den aldri hatt noen større betydning for ungdommers drikkemønster i Finland, sier Alström på telefon fra Helsinki til Dagbladet.no. FOKUSET PÅ SKYTEVÅPEN kommer ikke til å forsvinne etter Kauhajoki-massakren. Etter den andre skolemassakren på under ett år varsler statsminister Matti Vanhanen nå at landets våpenlover skal gjennomgås på nytt. Finland har verdens tredje høyeste våpentetthet, bare slått av USA og Jemen. Det er 55 skytevåpen per 100 innbyggere i vårt naboland, ifølge tall fra 2007. Tettheten er nesten dobbelt så høy som i Sverige. I dagens utgave av den britiske avisa The Guardian skriver redaktøren av finske Ilta-Sanomat Reijo Ruokanen en kommentar om finnenes forhold til sine våpen: - Jeg var 15 da jeg fikk mitt første våpen, ei hagle til jakt. Da jeg var 19 hadde jeg tre hagler og ei rifle. Alle var lovlige. Det er mer enn 2 millioner skytevåpen i Finland. 60 000 nye våpenlisenser utstedes av politiet hvert år, og 800 000 har lisens, skriver redaktøren. Ett av hovedpoengene til Ruokanen er at alle disse lovlige våpnene ikke har gjort spesielt stor skade. - 45 mennesker ble drept med kniv i Finland i 2006, 10 ble drept med skytevåpen. Ikke en eneste av dem ble drept av en underårig med et registrert våpen, skriver han. Selv etter de to skoledrapssakene kan man fremdeles hevde at å la unge mellom 15 og 18 få ha jaktvåpen ikke utgjør noen sikkerhetsrisiko, mener Ruokanen. Norsk våpenlovgivning er relativt lik den finske. Også her kan personer under 18 år søke politiet om å bli erklært skikket til å eie skytevåpen. Verken Matti Juhani Saari eller Pekka-Eric Auvinen hadde jaktbakgrunn, og begge var gamle nok til å skaffe seg våpentillatelser på egenhånd. SÅ ER DET NOE GALT MED FINLAND? Det er et naturlig spørsmål å stille seg når et så lite land gjennomgår to skolemassakrer på mindre enn ett år. Men det er også et spørsmål som vanskelig kan besvares. Det som er klart, er at mange finner har sosiale problemer de ikke så lett finner en vei ut av, enten det gjelder psykiske lidelser, mobbing eller alkoholmisbruk. Dette er imidlertid problemer som også gjelder for Norge, om enn i litt mindre målestokk. Den høye våpentettheten er riktignok særegen for Finland, og å ha et våpen tilgjengelig er en forutsetning for å kunne skyte noen. Men ingenting i forskningen tilsier at det som skjedde i Jokela i 2007 og i Kauhajoki i går skyldes noe som er særegent for Finland. Det er ikke bare i Finland personer sliter med depresjoner, mobbing, selvmordstanker, hat eller hva det nå kan være som har gjort to skolegutter til massedrapsmenn. Og det kunne nok like gjerne ha skjedd her til lands

mandag 14. juli 2008

This article defines key points
needed to build rock-solid knowledge for lifetime. Some points may be obvious to you, some
may be new. Those which require further discussion provide links to further materials on
this website and on the net. This article is also available in Simplified
English: Six steps to excellent memory




If you have found this place in the vast cyberspace of the web, you
are probably not the one to convince that knowledge is power, and that solutions to most
problems facing humanity could be found if we were armed with more understanding of how
the world works. While knowledge is power, information can be overpowering. An increasing
proportion of the population suffers from Information Fatigue Syndrome, i.e. from stress
related to being overwhelmed with an unmanageable glut of information.



This text introduces you to simple steps toward managing information
and toward rock-solid knowledge. No cheap miracles. Just a clear and straight approach
based on facts and science. Within the bounds of the possible.



I have been working on the problem of effective learning for 16
years now since, as a student of molecular biology, I first understood how I could greatly
change the quality of all my actions were I able to improve the recall of what I studied
for exams (and not only).

Now, I would like to share my experience with you for one major reason: I want to see more
people enjoy the blessing of empowering knowledge. If we all could learn and understand
more, the world would definitely look better for all of us. Although I represent a company
that is involved in commercial distribution of software tools and material for enhanced
learning, I guarantee that after going through my 20-minute course you will be
armed to
experience noticeable improvement in your learning ability without spending a penny!



You may find the first three points obvious. Please do not
stop reading if this is the case.



This is the shortest path to empowering knowledge:

  1. Nurse your hunger for knowledge - if your motivation for
    getting knowledge is weak you can stop reading this text. The rest of my advice will not
    work. Your motivation cannot be shallow (like for passing an exam, showing off at a party,
    impressing the boss, etc.). You have to find the clear-cut link between knowledge and the
    value it brings to life. Do you like science programs? Are you interested in how your
    computer works? Do you surf the net looking for news? If the answer is yes, you
    are probably on the right track. Can you spend more than 30 minutes on a totally
    uncreative and non-intellectual activity (e.g. gossip, adult magazines, unadulterated
    laziness, etc.)? If yes, you may have a motivational problem. The hunger for
    knowledge grows as you get more educated (the more you know the more you know you don't
    know). So there is an excellent remedy for poor motivation: learn more and see how it can
    impact your and others' life. Research shows that strong
    motivation may actually count more than your IQ
    . Do not forget about
    your health! A strong body makes it easier to nurture a well motivated mind



  2. Determine what you
    really need to know
    - you must first clearly identify the areas of knowledge that are
    most likely to positively influence your future. You will not even be able to skim the
    surface of the world's knowledge resources in your lifetime! The earlier you realize this
    the faster you will reach the point at which you will see that three well-selected pieces
    of knowledge may have the power to blast the entire shelf of ill-picked books. You must
    first see how much time you can spend on learning daily. Only a lucky few can afford to
    learn new things for more than an hour per day. If this is the case with you, the problem
    of knowledge selection is yet more burning. Take a long-term perspective. Do not get
    obsessed with learning just one subject, e.g. English, Excel or Economics! To assume a
    responsible position in society, you will need strong general knowledge on health,
    sociology, history, natural sciences, etc. Only those who can grasp the full picture are
    well positioned to be successful in their efforts



  3. Locate sources of information - unless you are in
    your student years, going through a collection of thick books may not be the best way to
    accomplish your goals. Limited time gives preference to an incremental approach. You can
    study lots of sources in parallel and pick only information of the highest priority. Have
    you discovered the power of the Internet? Lots of answers can now be found on the
    net (as this article: short, free, and, hopefully, making an impact). Obviously
    you should cast your net wide. TV, news magazines and the library are still irreplaceable
    in many areas. See also: Devouring knowledge and Incremental
    reading
    to find out about
    efficient strategies for collecting, prioritizing and processing knowledge from the
    web



  4. Formulate knowledge for active recall - this is the
    first point on the list that will require some convincing. Effective learning must be
    based on repetition. Otherwise whatever you learn will sooner or later be
    forgotten. Do not trust theories which tell you that you can develop memories lasting for
    lifetime! Everything you remember for life is somehow rehearsed by your memory (even if
    you are not aware of the repetition). The concept of permastore (indelible
    memory) is true only if you understand it as long-lasting memories that reach beyond your
    expected lifespan. No acquired memories last for ever; as a result, repetition is
    necessary to remember
    .



    An effective repetition must be based on active
    recall
    . This means that your brain must generate the answer.
    You cannot just
    passively process information. It is not enough to read that George Washington was the first US
    president
    . You need a question! For example: Who was the first US president?
    You will be disappointed to find out that most of the learning material available
    worldwide still does not comply with active recall! Additionally, whatever is based on active
    recall may not meet your expectations. Do you like running through exercises at the end of
    a course book? Probably not. The painful truth is that you will certainly have to formulate
    most of the knowledge yourself. After all, you will be getting it from various sources:
    CNN, Internet, Newsweek, encyclopedias, business journals, science journals, etc. These
    sources are not best suited for learning. They do not comply with the active
    recall principle. The
    time you invest in formulating knowledge for active recall will be returned manifold as
    long as you stick with the remaining principles of the presented formula for
    success in learning!
    (esp.
    Point 2: selecting only material that
    you need
    , and Point 5: repeating it in a
    rational manner
    ). You will yet need lots of time to perfect the skill of adequately
    formulating knowledge for learning. You will find more details in The 20 rules of formulating knowledge in learning
    (including Tony Buzan's mind maps, cloze deletion, handling enumerations, etc.)



  5. Use spaced repetition (i.e. repeat the material in
    properly selected intervals of time)
    - this point is most likely to enhance your
    learning skills even if you are a seasoned student! As mentioned earlier, you must repeat
    the learned material to make sure it really remains in your memory. The most difficult
    problem to solve is how to properly select the timing of repetitions. This problem has
    been solved for you and is immediately available as the SuperMemo method of fast learning
    (the name SuperMemo is derived from super memory and
    has nothing to do with memos). You can start using SuperMemo in minutes. You have three
    options, two of which are free:

    Once you learn how to use SuperMemo, you will remain for ever free
    of worries about being or not being able to remember the knowledge you learn. In newer
    versions of SuperMemo software, you can even tell the computer what proportion of
    knowledge you want to retain in memory (between 90-99%)


  6. Do not neglect knowledge management - once you start
    learning using the previously mentioned principles, you must not forget that your needs
    change in the same way as the world around you. This fact must find its reflection in
    learning! Repetitions of the learned material must become a standard fixture in your daily
    schedule. This time will be spent well if you carefully make sure at each repetition that
    the material you learn is really worth the time you put in it. It must be up-to-date,
    useful, and properly formulated. You may be saving 70-90% of your time if you remove or
    reformulate the hardest 5% of your learning material! The
    newest version of SuperMemo (see pictures)
    makes it possible to reschedule, postpone, dismiss, reedit
    or simply delete all material whose place in the learning process is changing. For more
    information about effective learning based on active recall and SuperMemo read: Learning Decalog



You may be now skeptical of whether the above procedure is really
worth the initial investment of time and adapting your mind to a new approach:

  • Is knowledge really so central to my life?
  • Is this active recall idea really critical? Why should I reformulate
    whatever I hear or read? Isn't it an awful waste of time?
  • Is the SuperMemo method really a must? Aren't my currently used
    methods sufficient? Reading a 5-page article, searching for shareware or shelling out a
    couple of dollars might be barriers many of you will not be ready to pass! Sticking with
    regular repetitions may be an even steeper obstacle


I have devoted all my academic and professional life to promoting
the above approach and I guarantee results to anyone who will have the will to try and the
persistence to continue. If you have any doubts, please do not hesitate and write to
SuperMemoMail with your
questions



Further reading







(Six Steps mind map
generated in Mind Manager 3.5, imported to SuperMemo
2004, courtesy of John England,
TeamLink Australia Pty Ltd)



See also: Recommended websites

fredag 11. juli 2008

Saddles and names

Danny Gray and Mustang mainly specialize in benches and saddles for
cruisers. Danny Gray makes some very nice two up seats for cruisers and
Mustang makes a wide variety of motorcycle seats with a more vintage
and stock look but with much improved comfort for the rider.


So when you decide to replace your OEM seat with a new one you might
want to take a look at Crobin, Sargent, Danny Gray or Mustang for a
quality replacement. Generally prices currentyl range from $250 to $500
and up for a quality custom saddle.

lørdag 5. juli 2008

Salvador Dali Muesum, Figueres




Figueres: Teatre Museu Dalí Print

The
Dalí Theatre-Museum, the largest surrealistic object in the world,
occupies the building of the former Municipal Theatre, a 19th century
construction which was destroyed at the end of the Spanish Civil War.
On its ruins, Dalí decided to create his museum.

Untitled

Konferanse/ seminar, Skal- skal-ikke.
Pris: 950,- pr dag, inkl lunsj.
Overnatting: Det er mulig å bestille rom på Radisson SAS Hotel Caledonien.
Ved stor pågang kan noen få tilbud om rom på Hotel Norge ca
150 meter fra Hotel Caledonien.
Betaling: Konferanseavgift betales til konto 5081 05 78669 – merk
med ditt navn og konferanse-08.
Påmelding: marte.eriksen@kpf.no
Ved påmelding til konferansen sender vi oversikt over de ulike parallellseminarene
og skjema for avkrysning av dine ønsker.
Kontakt oss: 22 34 09 32 eller marte.eriksen@kpf.no
Frist for påmelding og betaling av seminaravgift er 12.september. PÅMELDING

søndag 8. juni 2008

Lærende skoler, 4 artikler om skoleutvikling

UDIR sitt initiativ: Foreløpig 4 artikler om skoler og skoleutvikling (Lenket til Skoletor.wordpress.com)

torsdag 1. mai 2008

Wikispaces for educators

Wikispaces for educators- gratis og bra
Sjekk http://notator.wikispaces.com
Notater på WIKISPACES som over for Tor





Bare se på antall besøkende..!
Her får du privat wiki gratis.
Husk bare å merke av korrekt!